The paper submission undergoes an initial screening for adherence to journal guidelines. Following this, an assigned editor evaluates its originality, significance, and relevance. If deemed suitable, the paper proceeds to peer review by experts in the field. Based on their feedback, the editor makes a decision on acceptance, rejection, or revision. Accepted papers undergo final checks before publication, followed by dissemination and promotion. Feedback and metrics are monitored post-publication for impact assessment and archiving ensures long-term accessibility.
This agreement is jointly concluded by you (the customer) and us and applies to any one or more services you choose to provide. You confirm that, before starting the service, you should have the civil rights required by U.S. law that is compatible with your actions. Behavioral capacity, specifically: 1. You are a natural person who has reached the age of 18 and has full capacity for civil rights and civil conduct; 2. Or you are a person without capacity for civil conduct or a person with limited capacity for civil conduct, but your actions are represented by your guardian or with their consent and ratification.
This agreement is jointly concluded by you (the customer) and us and applies to any one or more services you choose to provide. You confirm that, before starting the service, you should have the civil rights required by U.S. law that is compatible with your actions. Behavioral capacity, specifically: 1. You are a natural person who has reached the age of 18 and has full capacity for civil rights and civil conduct; 2. Or you are a person without capacity for civil conduct or a person with limited capacity for civil conduct, but your actions are represented by your guardian or with their consent and ratification.
Adhering to the principle of "integrity, transparency, and goodwill," we provide consulting, support, and assistance services for scientific researchers to effectively improve the quality of academic papers and the efficiency of academic publishing. We conscientiously practice publishing ethics, do not provide, promote, or participate in academic misconduct, and are responsible for the integrity of data, manuscripts and services; the service products we supply are open and transparent, and researchers can easily and quickly obtain service-related information. We are legally compliant and, within reasonable limits, assist researchers in conducting research, writing reports, and publishing research results. We refuse to provide services for clients who violate publishing ethics and constitute academic misconduct and those responsible for dishonesty in scientific research. We hope you also follow the above principles.
In scientific research and academic activities, you should abide by the following academic ethics:
1. In academic activities, we should adhere to scientific truth, respect scientific laws, advocate a rigorous and realistic study style, dare to explore and innovate, abide by professional ethics, and maintain scientific integrity.
2. When conducting academic research, you should search for relevant literature or understand relevant research results. When citing other people's arguments in publishing papers or reporting scientific research results differently, you must respect intellectual property rights and mark them truthfully. When an author cites other people's academic works, the source of their academic works must be indicated. The quoted part cannot constitute the main part or substantial part of the citing person's work; when citing the achievements of a third party from the results of others, an explanation must be given; reference is made without mentioning the work of others, or inspired by the work of others without directly using the work of others, should also be explained and cited.
3. Respect research subjects (both human and non-human subjects). In research involving the human body, protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the topics and personal privacy and guaranteeing the right to informed consent is necessary.
4. Observe the principle of honesty and objectivity in project declaration, project design, data collection and analysis, publication of scientific research results, and confirmation of the contributions of scientific research participants. Errors and mistakes in published research results should be disclosed and acknowledged appropriately.
5. Work honestly and rigorously with others. Treat academic criticism and doubts patiently and sincerely.
6. The disclosure of research results, statistical data, and others may occur. It must be truthful, complete, and accurate.
7. The validity and accuracy of data collection and publication shall be ensured, and the integrity, authenticity and safety of experimental records and data shall be ensured for reference.
8. Professionals who contribute substantially to the research results own the copyright. Only general management or auxiliary workers for research projects can use this copyright.
9. Cooperation should be signed in the order of contribution to the research results (except where there is a signing convention or agreement). The signatory is responsible for the part of my contribution and should be reviewed and signed by me before publication. The signature of the academic achievement should be authentic, and the signer should bear the corresponding academic and legal responsibility for the achievement. All named authors are responsible for their own completed parts, and the first named author and corresponding author are responsible for the entire paper or work. For the research results of the student as the first author and the supervisor as the collaborator, the supervisor should be primarily responsible.
10. Before new scientific research results are published in academic journals or academic conferences (except for contractual restrictions), they should not be released to the media or the public.
11. Do not use scientific research activities to seek illegitimate interests. Correctly deal with direct, indirect, or potential interests in scientific research activities.
12. Scientific and technological workers must disseminate scientific and technical knowledge and responsibly disseminate scientific ideas and methods. Oppose fabrication of scientific and technological events inconsistent with the facts and press hype about scientific and technological circumstances.
13. Boycott all research activities that violate scientific ethics. If it is found that there are disadvantages or hazards in work, it should be consciously suspended or adjusted, or even terminated, and notify the competent authority of the research.
14. In the training of graduate students and young researchers, scientific ethics and codes of conduct should be taught. The selection of academic leaders and relevant scientific and technological talents should take scientific ethics and study style as the important bases.
15. When introducing and evaluating the achievements of oneself or others, the principles of objectivity, fairness, and accuracy should be followed, and comprehensive analysis, evaluation, and demonstration should be made based on fully grasping domestic and foreign materials and data.
16. All kinds of funded projects should be standardized and marked according to the requirements of the project issuing department, treat the research work of various scientific research projects with a serious attitude, and complete the tasks stipulated in the contract on time.
17. Comply with other codes of ethics recognized by the academic community.
Academic paper publication support fee includes (a registration fee, layout fee, and review fee)
Payment time: You should pay the cost after receiving the acceptance notification of the paper;
Fee standard: subject to D&F quotation;
Payment form: one-time full payment;
Once we receive the email, the editor board accepts the paper. We will send out a registration form with the total cost price.