Comparing Organic and Conventional Foods: Nutritional Value, Farming Practices, and Health Impacts

Authors

  • Yang Ning Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/kxgb7y47

Keywords:

Organic food, conventional food, health benefit, disease

Abstract

Recently, people’s choices have been influenced by growing concerns about health and the environment. Current research suggests that organic foods may have health benefits. The reason for this is that organic foods do not contain pesticides and have higher nutritional content and bioactive compounds. Furthermore, organic farming reduces greenhouse gas emissions and promotes biodiversity. Animal welfare is also taken into account in animal farming practices. However, research is still needed to understand the long-term health impacts of agriculture, as well as to address challenges related to productivity. This review aims to compare conventional and organic foods in terms of nutrition, farming practices, animal husbandry, and health impacts. While organic foods are often labeled as good for the environment, conventional methods are sometimes superior in terms of yield and nutrition. A mix of both methods is essential to creating sustainable systems. In the future, research should focus on the impacts of agriculture on human health and explore innovative methods for improving productivity in order to meet the needs of the global food supply.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles